Exam supervision

A report that states its own limits honestly.

Supervision ends with a signed document. It carries no integrity score, but it does list what the system could not check. Anyone outside can confirm the certificate by its code, without signing in.

Request a demo Verify a certificate

The subsystem has no direct access to the platform core and keeps its data separately.

Supervision report
Lean Manufacturing · final exam · 19.08.2026
no violations found
Course of supervision
10:02Identity check passed
10:04Exam started, 40 questions
10:31Gaze averted, 4 s
10:58Face lost from frame, 2 s
11:26Exam finished
11:41Reviewed by a proctor
What supervision did not check
  • a second computer, or a person outside the camera's field of view
  • paper notes out of frame
  • an external device filming the screen
  • remote-control software and screen recording by third-party tools
Verification by code ps_7Qk3Ra9vXm2LtBd8Nc.4hR2wQ7bK9nT This document is not a statement about the student's honesty
Supervision profiles

The university chooses the strictness, not the contractor

The level is set for the exam and written into the report in words. Whoever is shown the certificate is not obliged to know what “P2” means, so the document carries the description rather than the code.

Special arrangementsAt the student's request some detectors are switched off. This is stated explicitly in the report.
Degraded supervisionIf the camera or the network failed, supervision is marked as weakened rather than passed off as complete.
Turning the module offDisabling proctoring midway through an exam does not cut short the supervision of a session already under way.
Supervision profile
Final exam · cohort VT-24
P2 selected
P0no supervisionhomework
P1basic supervision (camera and exam window)continuous assessment
P2standard supervision (camera, audio, exam window)midterms and exams
P3enhanced supervisionfinal assessment
P4enhanced supervision with a room cameraat the university's decision
The chosen profile goes into the certificate word for word. The limits of supervision are recalculated for it automatically.
Public verification

The certificate is read by the person it is brought to

The point of the document is that it is shown to an outsider: another university, a panel, an employer. Requiring an account from them would make the certificate unverifiable, and therefore useless.

SignatureTampering with the verdict breaks the signature. Verification says so in words rather than failing silently.
No leakageThe code grants the right to confirm the document, not to read the supervision recordings.
A uniform answerAn unknown code and an invalid signature answer identically; otherwise the existence of sessions could be discovered by brute force.
Report verification
A public page, no sign-in required
signature validchecked just now
WhoSarsenova Aigerim
WhatLean Manufacturing, final exam
Supervisionstandard (camera, audio, exam window)
Outcome of the reviewno violations found
The document confirms that supervision took place and that its materials were reviewed by a person. It is not a statement about the student's honesty.
What we do not promise

The limits are stated in advance, not after an argument

01

There is no integrity score

An internal risk indicator helps the proctor set priorities and never reaches the document. No student should have to argue with a number that cannot be contested.

02

A person makes the decision

The certificate is issued after a proctor's review, including when a violation was found. The document records that a review happened, not that the sitting was clean.

03

A browser cannot see everything

A second computer, notes out of frame and remote control are not caught by supervision. This is written in every report.

We will run a supervised exam with your cohort

We will take one group and one exam. We will show what the student sees, what the proctor sees and what document is left in hand.

Request a demo Other products